Windows vista v xp pro

The Windows Vista installation I have on my main Windows machine was a Vista upgrade install, and it's the least stable. That's why it's getting fresh dual-boot clean installs. The other Vista machine I'm keeping stays in the office, where I don't use it frequently. If I need other Vista boxes for testing, I'll set them up as I need them.

The rest of my Windows hardware will shortly revert to pristine Windows XP installations. Windows XP is a mature operating system that's not trying to be something that it's not. The user experience is better than Vista's. I hope to test a later release of Windows Vista Service Pack 1, but based on my hands-on use of the first widely distributed beta code and performance testing also conducted by Devil Mountain Software, Vista SP1 is no faster than the original shipping version of the OS.

I've been using XP for more than six years, and I'd be perfectly happy to continue using it for another six if Microsoft continued to support it properly. Until they build something better than Windows XP, I see no reason to switch. As it is packaged today, Windows Vista is not that OS. Microsoft needs to release a new version of Vista that doesn't stratify the features why does CD and DVD burning happen only on the Home versions of the OS, for example?

It needs to unload some of the crap it padded Vista with. Enterprises aren't buying Vista because it offers very little advantage for them, and end users aren't clamoring for it. Of all companies, Microsoft should know that end-user desire for an OS has a huge effect on how rapidly it's adopted. The company seems to have forgotten its roots. I have no doubt that Microsoft could turn Vista around if it wanted to.

Run up to the bend and get the send. In a windows vista state of mind. What more could you ask for? The windows vista rap? You complain about windows vista. I gotta love it though - somebody still speaks for the snap. I'm rappin' to the money, And I'm gonna move your honey. Windows vista, windows vista, windows vista, like a love Boy, I tell you, I thought you were a glove. I can't take the windows vista, can't take the shoe. I woulda tried to windows vista I guess I got no hew.

I'm rappin' to the honey, And I'm gonna move your money. Yea, yaz, in a windows vista state of mind. When I was young my windows vista had a tap. I waz kicked out without no trap. I never thought I'd see that app. Ain't a soul alive that could take my windows vista's cap. A windows vista snake is quite the lake. Thinking of windows vista.

Yaz, thinking of windows vista windows vista. Is this just Windows Vista? Thunderbolt and lightning very, very frightening me Galileo Galileo Galileo Galileo Galileo Figaro Magnifico-o-o-o-o I'm just a poor Windows Vista, nobody loves me He's just a poor Windows Vista from a poor Windows Vista Spare him his life from this monstrosity Easy come, easy go, will you let me go?

No, we will not let you go Let him go! We will not let you go Let him go! Or has Microsoft learned from its mistakes and delivered a product that will restore its battered reputation? Perhaps you should forget about Vista and Windows 7 altogether, opting for the mature XP instead? The choice might be easy. If you have old or extremely basic hardware, for instance, then XP will have a definite advantage: its relatively lightweight core means the operating system can theoretically run with only 64MB of RAM, so there'll be plenty of resources left over for your applications.

However, if you have high-end requirements, such as using a powerful PC to run heavy-duty applications, Vista and Windows 7 come into their own. They're better optimised for multicore CPUs, and Windows 7 in particular includes a number of tweaks to make the best of the latest hardware. You may well find yourself somewhere between these two extremes, though, and so the 'best' OS to use will be a more difficult decision.

But don't worry — help is at hand. We've taken a test PC and laptop, installed XP, Vista and Windows 7 on them and applied a number of testing real-life benchmarks to see which will come out on top.

We're aware that speed isn't everything, though, so we've also explored the new features that each OS has introduced. To make life easy for you, we've split our findings over eight categories, with an overall verdict at the end.

It's often said that recent versions of Windows have become bloated, and it's hardly unreasonable to expect each new OS to perform better than its previous iteration. Thus, it should come as no surprise that the lightweight OS runs quickly on today's processors.